Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)

C.I.T.,Ahmedabad vs Reliance Petroproducts Pvt.Ltd on 17 March, 2010

7. We have heard both the parties and perused all the relevant material available on record. It is pertinent to note that in quantum appeal the Tribunal has confirmed the addition in respect of disallowance of loss on Forex Derivatives treating it as speculative loss and disallowance of Foreign Exchange Fluctuation loss which was claimed by the assessee as per the assessee's understanding. The advice given to the assessee by the Consultant cannot be termed as furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income as envisaged under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for penalty provisions. The decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Reliance Petroproducts ITA No.53/Ahd/2022 Assessment Year: 2008-09 Page 4 of 4 Pvt. Ltd. (supra) is categorically applicable in the assessee's case and, therefore, the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act is not justifiable on the part of the Assessing Officer. Thus, the penalty is deleted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 1723 - V S Sirpurkar - Full Document
1