Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.20 seconds)
Niyazuddin vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 3 September, 1997 cites

Emperor vs Karsandas Govindji Ved on 17 June, 1942

In Emperor v. Karsandas Govind Ji AIR 1942 Bombay 326 the accused was acquitted of the charge Under Section 390(1) of the City of Bombay Municipal Act, 1888, which provides that no person shall establish, in any premises, factory in which it is intended that steam, water and other mechanical power shall be employed without previous written permission of the Commissioner, nor shall any person work or allow to be worked in such factory without such permission. The trial Magistrate acquitted the accused holding that the offence was committed once for all--when the work was commenced in the factory--and prosecution of the same was barred Under Section 514 of the Act which stipulated that no person shall be liable for punishment for the offence Under Section 390 except within three months next after commission or discovery of such offence. The view taken by the Magistrate was not accepted by the Division Bench of Bombay High Court and it was held therein:
Bombay High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 20 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next