Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.38 seconds)The Right to Information Act, 2005
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Haryana vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 15 January, 2002
In the case of State of Haryana Vs. State of Punjab reported in (2002) 2 SCC 507 their Lordships held:-
Centre For Pil & Anr vs Union Of India & Anr on 3 March, 2011
17. The aforesaid provision of the Act and the manner of appointment has been discussed at length in the case of Centre for PIL vs. Union of India, (2011) 4 S.C.C. 1, where the appointment of P.J. Thomas as the Chief Vigilance Commissioner was challenged. In the landmark judgment rendered by the Supreme Court, their lordships (S.H. Kapadia, C.J.) observed :-
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 4 in The Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
N.Kannadasan vs Ajoy Khose & Ors on 6 May, 2009
When institutional integrity is in question, the touchstone should be "public interest" which has got to be taken into consideration by the HPC and in such cases the HPC may not insist upon proof [see para 103 of N. Kannadasan (supra)].