cites: 133048043

1 - 5 of 5 (0.17 seconds)

4. Whether Order Is To Be Circulated To ... vs M/S. Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd on 4 August, 2014 cites

Commissioner Of Central Excise, Jaipur vs M/S. J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd on 3 September, 2004

4. The Ld. AR on behalf of the Revenue submits that the mines are situated 40 kms away from the factory. He relied upon the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of CCE, Jaipur Vs. J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. 2004 (171) ELT 289 (S.C.)

Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 61 - G P Mathur - Full Document

M/S Vikram Cement vs Cce, Indore on 24 July, 2009

5. Respectfully following the decision of the Honble Supreme Court, in the applicants own case, we remand this matter to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh in the light of the decision of Vikram Cement Ltd. (supra) and their own case. The appeals are allowed by way of remand.

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 25 - Cited by 124 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Central Excise, Jaipur vs M/S. J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd on 3 September, 2004

M/S Vikram Cement vs Cce, Indore on 24 July, 2009

M/S. Madras Cements Ltd vs Cce, Chennai on 24 June, 2011

Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

M/S Mangalm Cement Ltd vs Cce, Jaipur-I on 14 October, 2009

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Commissioner Of Central Excise, Jaipur vs M/S. J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd on 3 September, 2004

M/S Vikram Cement vs Cce, Indore on 24 July, 2009

M/S. Madras Cements Ltd vs Cce, Chennai on 24 June, 2011

Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

M/S Mangalm Cement Ltd vs Cce, Jaipur-I on 14 October, 2009