Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.26 seconds)Section 3 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 30 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Land Acquisition Officer, Dy. ... vs Gonda Chinna Rajanna on 10 March, 1999
23. The Division Bench of the High Court in Land Acquisition Officer,
Deputy Collector, Pochampad v. Gonda Chinna Rajanna (cited supra),
wherein petitions were filed for restoration of reference by the petitioners after a
delay ranging from 17 years to 22 years to set aside the ex-parte decree and the
learned counsel for the respondents therein also submitted that the reference
made under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, cannot be dismissed
for default of the claimant or it cannot be closed for non-appearance of the
claimant, the Division Bench observed that:
Mir Fazeelath Hussain And Ors vs Special Deputy Collector, Land ... on 15 May, 1992
25. The Hon'ble Apex Court in Pathapati Subba Reddy (dead) by LRs.
and Others v. The Special Deputy Collector (LA) (cited supra), wherein no
21
Dr.GRR, J
crp_450_2021 & batch
steps were taken to substitute the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased
claimant in land acquisition matters, held that:
Bhag Mal(Alias) Ram Bux & Ors vs Munshi(D) By Lrs on 17 January, 2007
In Bhag Mal alias Ram Bux and
Ors. vs. Munshi (Dead) by LRs. and Ors. [(2007) 11 SCC
285], it has been observed that different provisions of
Limitation Act may require different construction, as for
example, the court exercises its power in a given case liberally
in condoning the delay in filing the appeal under Section 5 of
the Limitation Act, however, the same may not be true while
construing Section 3 of the Limitation Act. It, therefore,
follows that though liberal interpretation has to be given in
construing Section 5 of the Limitation Act but not in applying
Section 3 of the Limitation Act, which has to be construed
strictly.