Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.22 seconds)Section 146 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
The Notaries Act, 1952
C.C. Alavi Haji vs Palapetty Muhammed & Anr on 18 May, 2007
10. It is settled law that if the demand notice is properly and
correctly addressed, there is presumption of service thereof. It is then
for the accused to prove that he did not receive the demand notice and
this cannot be accomplished by a mere denial. For this proposition,
reliance is placed upon the pronouncements of the Supreme Court in
C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammad 2007 Cri.L.J. 3214
reiterated in Ajeet Seeds Ltd. v. K. Gopala Krishnaiah VI (2014)
SLT 524.
Section 251 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
M/S Ajeet Seeds Ltd vs K Gopala Krishnaiah on 16 July, 2014
10. It is settled law that if the demand notice is properly and
correctly addressed, there is presumption of service thereof. It is then
for the accused to prove that he did not receive the demand notice and
this cannot be accomplished by a mere denial. For this proposition,
reliance is placed upon the pronouncements of the Supreme Court in
C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammad 2007 Cri.L.J. 3214
reiterated in Ajeet Seeds Ltd. v. K. Gopala Krishnaiah VI (2014)
SLT 524.