Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.19 seconds)Rajinder Nath Etc vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi on 13 August, 1979
He also referred to the provisions of Section 18(8) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act and placed reliance on Rajinder Nath v. Commissioner of Income-tax [1979] 120 ITR 14 (SC).
Ghanshyamdas Chhotalal vs Sales Tax Officer And Ors. on 16 October, 1963
17. As the petitioner has not challenged the remand order passed by the Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax, it is not necessary to consider the submissions made about the same. However, in support of the other contentions he placed reliance on the following decisions : [1963] 14 STC 674 (Rajab Alt Farishta v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P.), (1971) 4 VKN 77 (R.S. Seth Gopikisan Agrawal & Sons, Tumsar v. C.L. Sharma, Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Jabalpur), (1968) 1 VKN 1 (Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Indore v. Malwa Vanaspati and Chemical Co. Ltd., Indore), [1963] 14 STC 976 (SC) (Ghanshyamdas v. Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax), [1962] 44 ITR 809 (SC) (Income-tax Officer v. S.K. Habibullah), [1969] 24 STC 491 (SC) (Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax v. Dhanalakshmi Vilas Cashew Co.), [1982] 49 STC 181 (Commissioner of Sales Tax, Lucknow v. Babu Lal Parmanand), [1984] 57 STC 89 (R.P.M. Srinivasalu & Bros.
The Income Tax Officer, Madras vs S. K.Habibullah, Madras on 24 January, 1962
17. As the petitioner has not challenged the remand order passed by the Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax, it is not necessary to consider the submissions made about the same. However, in support of the other contentions he placed reliance on the following decisions : [1963] 14 STC 674 (Rajab Alt Farishta v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P.), (1971) 4 VKN 77 (R.S. Seth Gopikisan Agrawal & Sons, Tumsar v. C.L. Sharma, Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Jabalpur), (1968) 1 VKN 1 (Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Indore v. Malwa Vanaspati and Chemical Co. Ltd., Indore), [1963] 14 STC 976 (SC) (Ghanshyamdas v. Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax), [1962] 44 ITR 809 (SC) (Income-tax Officer v. S.K. Habibullah), [1969] 24 STC 491 (SC) (Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax v. Dhanalakshmi Vilas Cashew Co.), [1982] 49 STC 181 (Commissioner of Sales Tax, Lucknow v. Babu Lal Parmanand), [1984] 57 STC 89 (R.P.M. Srinivasalu & Bros.
Deputy Commissioner Of Agricultural ... vs Dhanalakshmi Vilas Cashew Co. on 18 February, 1969
17. As the petitioner has not challenged the remand order passed by the Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax, it is not necessary to consider the submissions made about the same. However, in support of the other contentions he placed reliance on the following decisions : [1963] 14 STC 674 (Rajab Alt Farishta v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P.), (1971) 4 VKN 77 (R.S. Seth Gopikisan Agrawal & Sons, Tumsar v. C.L. Sharma, Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Jabalpur), (1968) 1 VKN 1 (Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Indore v. Malwa Vanaspati and Chemical Co. Ltd., Indore), [1963] 14 STC 976 (SC) (Ghanshyamdas v. Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax), [1962] 44 ITR 809 (SC) (Income-tax Officer v. S.K. Habibullah), [1969] 24 STC 491 (SC) (Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax v. Dhanalakshmi Vilas Cashew Co.), [1982] 49 STC 181 (Commissioner of Sales Tax, Lucknow v. Babu Lal Parmanand), [1984] 57 STC 89 (R.P.M. Srinivasalu & Bros.
The Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd vs C.I.T., West Bengal, Calcutta on 29 March, 1972
New India Investment Corporation Ltd. vs Income-Tax Officer And Ors. on 19 May, 1983
18. As regards the alternative remedy, so far as the writ jurisdiction is concerned, he placed reliance on the following decisions : Sardar Mahinder Singh v. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax [1971] 28 STC 427, New India Investment Corporation Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer [1983] 143 ITR 909 and Sales Tax Officer v. Timber & Fuel Corporation [1973] 31 STC 585 (SC).
The Sales Tax Officer, Navgaon, And Anr. vs Timber And Fuel Corporation on 22 February, 1973
18. As regards the alternative remedy, so far as the writ jurisdiction is concerned, he placed reliance on the following decisions : Sardar Mahinder Singh v. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax [1971] 28 STC 427, New India Investment Corporation Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer [1983] 143 ITR 909 and Sales Tax Officer v. Timber & Fuel Corporation [1973] 31 STC 585 (SC).
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
R.S. Seth Gopikisan Agrawal And Sons vs Shri C.L. Sharma, Assistant ... on 12 October, 1970
17. As the petitioner has not challenged the remand order passed by the Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax, it is not necessary to consider the submissions made about the same. However, in support of the other contentions he placed reliance on the following decisions : [1963] 14 STC 674 (Rajab Alt Farishta v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P.), (1971) 4 VKN 77 (R.S. Seth Gopikisan Agrawal & Sons, Tumsar v. C.L. Sharma, Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Jabalpur), (1968) 1 VKN 1 (Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Indore v. Malwa Vanaspati and Chemical Co. Ltd., Indore), [1963] 14 STC 976 (SC) (Ghanshyamdas v. Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax), [1962] 44 ITR 809 (SC) (Income-tax Officer v. S.K. Habibullah), [1969] 24 STC 491 (SC) (Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax v. Dhanalakshmi Vilas Cashew Co.), [1982] 49 STC 181 (Commissioner of Sales Tax, Lucknow v. Babu Lal Parmanand), [1984] 57 STC 89 (R.P.M. Srinivasalu & Bros.