Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.27 seconds)

Union Of India & Anr vs Madhav S/O Gajanan Chaubal & Anr on 18 September, 1996

(d) In the small cadre upto '13' posts the method prescribed for preparation of rosters does not permit the reservation to be made for both categoriese true copy ST. Therefore, enclosed roster (Annexure-III) for posts may be followed. The principles of operating the rosters has been detailed in the Explanatory Notes. The reservation even in single post have been held as constitutional and valid recently by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India and others v. Madhav sio Gajanan Chauhbai and others, JT 1996 (9) SC
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 22 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Jarnail Singh vs Lachhmi Narain Gupta . on 26 September, 2018

The undersigned is directed to bring to your notice the judgement dated 28.1.2022 of the Supreme Court of India in the case of Jarnail Singh and Ors. V. Lachhmi Narain Gupta and Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 629 of 2022 arising out of SLP (C) No. 30621 of 2011) and other connected matters. Pursuant to this judgement, the Ld. Attorney General for India has rendered his considered opinion in the matter.
Supreme Court of India Cites 45 - Cited by 221 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Union Of India vs Col. Rakesh Malik (Retd) on 7 May, 2018

SC/ST/OBCs should apply to the posts and not to the vacancies. The Court further held that the vacancy based rosters can operate only till such time as the representation of the persons belonging to the reserved categories, in a cadre, reaches the prescribed percentage of reservation. Thereafter, the rosters cannot operate and vacancies released by retirement, resignation, promotion etc., of the persons belonging to the general and the reserved categories are to be filled by the appointment of the persons from the respective category so that the prescribed percentage of reservation is maintained.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1