Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.16 seconds)The Limitation Act, 1963
Union Of India And Ors vs West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. & Anr on 5 February, 2004
In this connection, he relies upon a decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Union of India v. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. and Anr., reported in (2004) 2 Supreme Court Cases, 747, regarding the doctrine of merger. Secondly, that after the appellate judgment the petitioner had filed representation before the defendants-authorities for honouring the decree and taking steps in accordance thereto, and hence limitation should have been counted from 12.8.1988, the date on which the said representation was rejected.
Ramnath Sao Alias Ramnath Sahu And Ors. vs Goberdhan Sao And Ors. on 26 February, 2003
And thirdly, that such technicalities should not stand in the way of substantial justice as the decree was affirmed upto the High Court and hence the apposite party- defendants, which claims to be a welfare State, should not have taken such technical grounds and the learned Court below itself should have condoned the delay, in this connection, be relies upon two decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court in cases of Ramnath Sao v. Gobardhan Sao, reported in 2002 (3) PLJR (SC), 247 and State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Pd. Singh, reported in 2000 (3) PLJR (SC), 81, by which long delays were condoned.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
1