Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.32 seconds)

State Of U.P vs Krishna Master & Ors on 3 August, 2010

2024.11.26 16:03:32 +0530 as a whole appears to have a ring of truth. Once that impression is found, it is undoubtedly necessary for the Court to scrutinize the evidence more particularly keeping in view the deficiencies, draw backs and infirmities pointed out in the evidence as a whole and evaluate them to find out whether it is against the general tenor of the evidence. Minor discrepancies on trivial matters not touching the core of the case, hyper technical approach by taking sentences torn out of context here or there from the evidence, attaching importance to some technical error committed by the investigating officer not going to the root of the matter should not ordinarily permit rejection of the evidence as a whole (Reliance placed on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in State of UP vs Krishna Master & Ors, decided on 03/08/2010 in Crl. Appeal No. 1180/2004).
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 518 - J M Panchal - Full Document
1   2 Next