Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.22 seconds)Section 20 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 418 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 227 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Dr. Raghubir Sharan vs The State Of Bihar on 14 March, 1963
892), Dr. Raghubir Saran v. State of Bihar and
another (AIR 1964 SC 1)). It would not be proper
for the High Court to analyse the case of the
complainant in the light of all probabilities in
order to determine whether a conviction would be
sustainable and on such premises, arrive at a
conclusion that the proceedings are to be quashed.
It would be erroneous to assess the material before
it and conclude that the complaint cannot be
proceeded with. In proceeding instituted on
complaint, exercise of the inherent powers to quash
the proceedings is called for only in a case where
the complaint does not disclose any offence or is
frivolous, vexatious or oppressive. If the
allegations set out in the complaint do not
constitute the offence of which cognizance has been
taken by the Magistrate, it is open to the High
Court to quash the same in exercise of the inherent
powers under Section 482 of the Code. It is not,
however, necessary that there should be meticulous
analysis of the case before the trial to find out
whether the case would end in conviction or
acquittal. The complaint has to be read as a whole.