Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.94 seconds)

Abdul Razaq vs Nanhey And Ors. on 22 November, 1983

3. Whereas, the learned Public Prosecutor representing respondent/ State in opposing the same supported the trial Court's judgment in finding the petitioner guilty for both the offences and also the sentence of imprisonment with fine and further submitted that for this Court while sitting in appeal against the trial Court's said conviction judgment or on the quantum of sentence, there is nothing to interfere and the trial Court judgment is well considered and supported by reasons having fresh in mind of the facts, merely because of some other view is possible, the Court cannot rightly interfere with the appeal as held in Abdul Razaq Vs. Nanhey and others1 and sought for dismissal of the appeal.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 14 - Full Document
1