Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.34 seconds)Section 62 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 96 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015
Surya Dev Rai vs Ram Chander Rai & Ors on 7 August, 2003
"13. But courts should always bear in mind a
distinction between (i) cases where such
alternative remedy is available before Civil
Courts in terms of the provisions of Code of
Civil Procedure and (ii) cases where such
alternative remedy is available under special
enactments and/or statutory rules and the fora
provided therein happen to be quasi-judicial
authorities and tribunals. In respect of cases
falling under the first category, which may
involve suits and other proceedings before civil
29/48
http://www.judis.nic.in
C.R.P.(NPD) No.3331 of 2019
courts, the availability of an appellate remedy
in terms of the provisions of CPC, may have to
be construed as a near total bar. Otherwise,
there is a danger that someone may challenge
in a revision under Article 227, even a decree
passed in a suit, on the same grounds on
which the respondents 1 and 2 invoked the
jurisdiction of the High Court. That is why, a 3
member bench of this court, while overruling
the decision in Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander
Raj [(2003) 6 SCC 675], pointed out in RAdhey
Shyam v. Chabbi Nath [(2015) 5 SCC 423]
that "orders of civil court stand on different
footing from the orders of authorities or
Tribunals or courts other than judicial / civil
courts.