Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.21 seconds)Section 3A in The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 [Entire Act]
Devendra Pratap Narain Rai Sharma vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 3 November, 1961
1 AIR 1962 SC 1334
7
“12. …The bar of O.2 R. 2 of the Civil Procedure Code on
which the High Court apparently relied may not apply to
a petition for a high prerogative writ under Art. 226 of the
Constitution, but the High Court having disallowed the
claim of the appellant for salary prior to the date of the
suit, we do not think that we would be justified in
interfering with the exercise of its discretion by the High
Court.”
Placing reliance on the case of Devendra Pratap Narain
Rai Sharma (supra), this Court in Gulabchand Chhotalal
Parikh v. State of Gujarat2 in relation to Order II Rule 2 held as
follows:
Gulabchand Chhotalal Parikh vs State Of Bombay (Now Gujarat) on 14 December, 1964
1 AIR 1962 SC 1334
7
“12. …The bar of O.2 R. 2 of the Civil Procedure Code on
which the High Court apparently relied may not apply to
a petition for a high prerogative writ under Art. 226 of the
Constitution, but the High Court having disallowed the
claim of the appellant for salary prior to the date of the
suit, we do not think that we would be justified in
interfering with the exercise of its discretion by the High
Court.”
Placing reliance on the case of Devendra Pratap Narain
Rai Sharma (supra), this Court in Gulabchand Chhotalal
Parikh v. State of Gujarat2 in relation to Order II Rule 2 held as
follows:
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
1