Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.51 seconds)
Brij Ratan Kothari vs Aklesh Sahu on 23 July, 2002 cites

N.S.S.Narayana Sarma & Ors vs M/S.Goldstone Exports P. Ltd. & Ors on 23 November, 2001

7. So, it must be held that whenever house is standing and the vacant land by side annexed to such house if not excluded shall form a part of house. Once a decree for ejectment is passed the tenant must vacate not only the house he has occupied but also from the vacant land annexed thereto or from such holding and that was done in the instant case. So, the finding of the Learned Judge that the decree shall be executeable only with regard to the 5 lechas of land under the house and not from vacant land as it does not include the vacant land is absolutely untenable and this part of the finding shall stand set aside and quashed, Once this finding is quashed, there is no need to go to the other points but even in respect of it Mr. Goswami, Learned Advocate for the appellant relies on a decision reported in 2002 (1) SCC Page 662 (N.S.S. Narayana Sarma and Ors. v. Goldstone Exports (P.) Ltd. and Ors.) wherein in paragraph 16 the Supreme Court pointed out as follows :
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 71 - D P Mohapatra - Full Document
1