Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.36 seconds)Section 304B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Niranjan Singh & Anr vs Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote & Ors on 10 March, 1980
In support of such submission, Mr. Dhal, relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Niranjan Singh and Anr. v. Pravakar Rajaram Kharot and Ors. , wherein the Supreme Court held as follows:
Section 439 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sushil Kumar Sharma vs Union Of India And Ors on 19 July, 2005
In the case of Susil Kumar Sharma v. Union of India and Ors. reported in (2005) 6 SCC 287 the Supreme Couri has observed:
Anwari Begum vs Sher Mohammad And Anr on 19 September, 2005
In the case of Anwari Begum v. Sher Mohammad and Anr. , the Supreme Court held as follows:
Akula Ravinder And Others vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 11 January, 1991
10. It is argued that the death in the present case being not under normal circumstances, the provisions of Section 304-B are attracted. The Supreme Court in the case of Akula Ravinder and Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, reported in 1991 SCC (Cri) 990, has observed that in a case where the prosecution has failed to establish that it was an unnatural death, it cannot be surmised that the death must be due to unnatural circumstances. The facts of the said case are more or less identical to that in the present case.