Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.27 seconds)The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002
Section 9 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Khanapuram Gandaiah vs Administrative Officer & Ors on 4 January, 2010
"35. At this juncture, it is necessary to clear some misconceptions about the RTI
Act. The RTI Act provides access to all information that is available and existing.........A
public authority is also not required to furnish information which require drawing of
inferences and/or making of assumptions. It is also not required to provide `advice' or
`opinion' to an applicant, nor required to obtain and furnish any `opinion' or `advice'
to an applicant. The reference to `opinion' or `advice' in the definition of `information'
in section 2(f) of the Act, only refers to such material available in the records of the
public authority. Many public authorities have, as a public relation exercise, provide
advice, guidance and opinion to the citizens. But that is purely voluntary and should not
be confused with any obligation under the RTI Act." (Emphasis Supplied)
Similarly, in the matter of Khanapuram Gandaiah vs Administrative Officer &Ors.
[SLP (CIVIL) NO.34868 OF 2009], the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under:
Dr. Celsa Pinto, Ex-Officio Joint ... vs The Goa State Information Commission ... on 3 April, 2008
(Emphasis Supplied)
And, in the matter of Dr. Celsa Pinto, Ex-Officio Joint Secretary, (School
Education) vs. The Goa State Information Commission [2008 (110) Bom L R 1238], the
Hon'ble Bombay High Court held as under:
1