Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (3.09 seconds)
Medical Council Of India vs Ritwik on 26 July, 2021 cites

S. Krishna Sradha vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh Medical ... on 21 August, 2019

The direction given by the High Court pertains to the admission for the academic year 2019-2020. The High Court ought not to have shown indulgence to the writ petitioners by directing admission in the vacant seats that arose in the year 2019-2020 and permit the students to start their course in the academic year 2020-2021. We are aware that the interference by this Court would cause loss of an academic year to the students. However, we cannot support the judgment of the High Court in granting admission for the year 2020- 2021 as it is contrary to the judgment of this Court in S. Krishna Sradha (supra) case. The students approached the High Court almost one and a half year after the last date of admission of the first year MBBS course for the academic year 2019-2020.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 51 - Full Document

Kaunain Nawaz Raza vs Union Of India & Ors on 22 August, 2019

The National Medical Commission has filed these appeals challenging the order dated 09.02.2021. The learned counsel appearing for the Commission submitted that the High Court committed an error in directing the admission of respondents No.1 in these appeals in the vacancies that arose in the academic year 2019-2020. He submitted that the judgment of the Calcutta High Court in Kaunain Nawaz Raza v. Union of India & Ors. in MAT 1202 of 2019 is in the peculiar facts of that case and that it could not have been taken as precedent by the High Court to pass an order in favour of respondents No.1.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1