Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.37 seconds)The Companies Act, 1956
Gannmani Anasuya & Ors vs Parvatini Amarendra Chowdhary & Ors on 17 May, 2007
In a recent case of Gannmani Anasuya and Others v.
Parvatini Amarendra Chowdhary and Others, (2007) 10 SCC 296,
7
this Court highlighted with reference to Section 3 of the Limitation
Act that it is for the court to determine the question as to whether the
suit is barred by limitation or not irrespective of the fact that as to
whether such a plea has been raised by the parties; such a
jurisdictional fact need not be even pleaded.
Sumatidevi M. Dhanwatay vs Union Of India And Ors on 6 April, 2004
an obligation to protect the interest of the complainant and in this
regard placed reliance upon the decision of this Court in Sumatidevi
M. Dhanwatay v. Union of India & Ors., 2004 (4) SCALE 607.
Firstly, the cited judgment has no application to the present fact
situation. Secondly, and more importantly, the complaint having
been held time barred, this plea is not of much significance.
Haryana Urban Development Authority vs B.K. Sood on 26 October, 2005
In Haryana Urban Development Authority v. B.K. Sood,
(2006) 1 SCC 164, this Court while dealing with the same provision
viz., Section 24A of the Act, 1986 held:
The Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Section 3 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
1