Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 11 November, 1974
Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal and another, and
Gorkha Security Services v. State (NCT of Delhi), held in paragraph 12 as under:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)Southern Painters vs Fertilizers & Chemicals Travancore Ltd on 10 September, 1993
sy (1978) 1 SCC 70;
Southern Painters Vs. Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Lid, (1994) 'Suppl (2)
SCC 699, and Gorkha Security Services.
Joseph Vilangandan vs The Executive Engineer, Buildings & ... on 20 March, 1978
Vs. Government (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.,
(2014) 9 SCC 105); Joseph Vilangandan vs. The Executive Engineer, (PW)
Ernakulam and others, (1978) 3 SCC 36)). Thus, blacklisting operates qua a |
particular party against whom a decision is taken by a tendering authority to
blacklist such party, by following a due procedure in law.
Bvg India Ltd vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 19 March, 2021
(BVG India Ltd vs. State
of Maharashtra & others, Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 4046 of 2020 -- High Court of
Judicature at Bombay).
Vetindia Pharmaceuticals Limited vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 6 November, 2020
|
4 3) = In a recent judgment reported in Vetindia Pharmaceuticals Vs. State of U.P.
(2021) 1 SCC 804, the Hon'ble Apex Court after referring to the judgments in Mis.
Gorkha Security Services vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 4 August, 2014
Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal and another, and
Gorkha Security Services v. State (NCT of Delhi), held in paragraph 12 as under:
Umc Technologies Private Ltd. vs Food Corporation Of India on 16 November, 2020
- 14) In UMC Technologies Private Limited v. Food Corporation of India and
Another (2021) 2 SCC 551, similar issue came up for consideration. The terms of
tender conditions were identical to the conditions in the instant case. In the said
case also the Appellant was declared as a successful bidder and was appointed
as a contractor for a period of two years for undertaking the tender work of
conducting recruitment of watchman for the Corporation. On 01.04.2018, the
appellant conducted a written exam for 'eligible aspirants for the post of
watchman. However, on the same day, a Special Task Force of Bhopal Police,
'arrested 50 persons in Gwalior, who were in possession iof certain handwritten
documents which prima facie appeared to be the question papers related to the
examination conducted by the appellant. Upon receipt of the above information,
the Corporation issued a show cause notice dated 10.04.2018 to the appellant
informing the appellant about the said arrest and seizure of documents which
appeared to contain question papers related to the examination conducted by the
appellant. The appellant was directed to furnish an explanation within 15 days,
failing which an appropriate ex-parte decision would be taken by the Corporation.
The appellant replied to the said notice on 12.04.2018 enclosing the necessary
" !
documents.
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
1