Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.28 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 173 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Kartar Singh vs State Of Punjab on 11 March, 1994
Even, lalkara was not raised by Rajat-appellant. This Court
in "Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab, 2010 (2) RCR (Criminal) 542,
acquitted the accused on the ground that allegation against him was
that he raised 'lalkara'. So, even, if, Rajat-appellant had raised
'lalkara', he could be granted benefit of doubt, on the basis of
judgment (supra). Even, he did not exhort Pawan-appellant to cause
injury to the deceased-Pankaj and he is not the owner of the
motorcycle and his possession, thereon, is not proved. So, he should
have been granted benefit of doubt by the learned trial Court.