Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.39 seconds)Article 21A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 18 in The Delhi School Education Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
Head Master,Lawrence School,Lovedale vs Jayanthi Raghu & Anr on 16 March, 2012
In many statutory rules and rules of
many organizations , there is provided a three year period of probation like
in the case of Lawrence School (supra). Therefore, probation period
undoubtedly can be of 3 years under Rule 105 because as already stated
there is no outer limit of probation period provided. The question is that for
how long beyond the third year can a period of probation continue. In my
opinion, reasonable period will have to be dependent on the facts of each
case including as to what is the post or nature of employment in question,
what are the terms and conditions agreed to at the time of original
WP(C) 8652/2011 Page 16 of 19
appointment and subject of course to the same being in accordance with
Delhi School Education Act and Rules, 1973. The nature of job or duties to
be performed by the teacher will also have to be kept in mind. It will also
have to be kept in mind whether the teacher will be overage for similar
employment if he/she is not confirmed. Keeping in mind all the relevant
facts, probation period, except in exceptional cases, so far as a teacher is
concerned, should not continue beyond a period of 5 years from the first
date of appointment. Even a period of 4/5 years has to be really in a very
grave and exceptional case depending on the facts of that case. However, I
do not express myself finally with respect to what should be a reasonable
period between 3 to 5 years because Courts will necessarily examine that
aspect in the facts and circumstances of each individual case. I am making
these specific observations with respect to the maximum period of
probation being ordinarily only of 5 years because in the absence of fixing
an outer limit by the statute viz Rule 105, the entire purpose of a probation
period and a probationary teacher being confirmed would be defeated by
the machinations of the management of the schools in certain cases thus
affecting education and bringing in of Article 21A in the Constitution.
Therefore, I hold that the Rule 105 must be so interpreted that the
reasonable period therein should ordinarily be around three years, should
WP(C) 8652/2011 Page 17 of 19
not extend beyond five years in most of the cases, and, in the rarest or rare
cases, one more year upto 6 years may be considered. However again at the
cost of repetition it is stated that six years period is being observed only as a
most grave and rarest of rare circumstance in a case, and ordinarily, a
probation period qua a teacher should not extend beyond/around three years
which is a reasonable period, and as per the facts and circumstances of
certain case, and which issues/decisions are of course justiciable before
Courts the probation period can go up to 5/6 years as stated above.
Dayaram Dayal vs State Of M.P. And Anr on 28 August, 1997
In Dayaram Dayal (supra),
it had been held that if no order for confirmation was passed within the
maximum period of probation, the probationer judicial officer could be
deemed to have been confirmed after expiry of four years period of
probation.
Article 45 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 12 in The Delhi School Education Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
THE CONSTITUTION (EIGHTY-SIXTH AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002
Kathuria Public School vs Director Of Education And Anr. on 28 May, 2004
I am of course not touching on those aspects because
such aspects are governed by the ratios of the judgments in the cases of
Kathuria Public School(supra) and Delhi Public School (supra).