Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (2.98 seconds)

M. R. Balaji And Others vs State Of Mysore on 28 September, 1962

The first challenge is to r. 5 on the ground that it violates Art. 15 of the Constitution. Article 15 forbids discrimination against any citizen on the grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them. At the same time Art. 15 (4) inter alia permits the State to make any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens. The contention is that the list of socially, and educationally backward classes for whom reservation is made under r. 5 nothing but a list of certain castes. Therefore, reservation in favour of certain castes based only on caste considerations violates Art. 15(1), which prohibits discrimination on the ground of caste only. Now if the reservation in question bad been based only on caste and had not taken into account the social and educational backwardness of the caste in question, it would be violative of Art. 15(1), But it must not be forgotten that a caste is also a class of citizens and if the caste is a whole is socially and educationally backward reservation can be made in favour of such a caste on the around that it is a socially and educationally backward class of citizens within the meaning of Art. 15(4). Reference in this connection may be made to the observations of this Court in M. R. Balaji v. State of Mysore(1) to the effect that it was not irrelevant to consider the caste of a class of citizens in determining their social and educational backwardness. It was further observed that though the caste of a class of citizens may (1) [1963] Supp. 1 S.C.R. 439 at p. 459-460.
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 268 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document
1