Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.19 seconds)The Court-fees Act, 1870
Sengoda Nadar vs Doraiswami Gounder And Ors. on 14 August, 1970
Since there is a decision of Sadasivam, J., in Sengoda Nadar v. Doraiswami , holding that the subject matter has to be Valued with reference to the market value of the properties involved, the matter has been placed before this Court.
Kolachala Kutumba Sastri vs Lakkaraju Bala Tripura Sundaramma And ... on 3 March, 1939
In view of this, the question for consideration will be whether the Full Bench judgment referred to above construing Section 7 (iv-A) of the Court-fees Act, 1870, as amended by the, Madras Court-fees (Amendment) Act, 1922, can be overlooked or ignored for" construing Section 40 of the Madras Court-fees, and Suits Valuation Act, 1955. He has not actually stated in what respects the corresponding section differed' from Section 40 of, the Madras, Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955.
Annamalai Reddi And Ors. vs Abdul Sathar Sahib on 9 September, 1952
The Full Bench negatived the contention and agreed With the view of Venkatasubba Rao, J., in Bali Reddi v. Abdul Satar (1936) I.L.R. 59 Mad. 240 : 69 M.L.J. 458 : A.I.R. 1935 Mad. 863, and held that the Court-fee has to be paid on the market value of the property as on the date of the plaint. The Full Bench held that "The Court-fee is to be calculated on the amount or the value of the property and to give the wording of para (iv-A) its plain meaning, the valuation must be the valuation based on the market value of the property at the date of the plaint.
1