Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)
Sanjay vs State Of U.P. on 31 July, 2023 cites

Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984

However, up to this stage, no such circumstance has emerged necessitating the custodial arrest of applicant during the pendency of trial. It is lastly contended that there is no recovery from the applicant either. Present case is a case of circumstantial evidence, therefore, there is no eye witness of the occurrence. The complicity of the applicants in the crime in question has to be judged in the light of the parameters laid down by the Apex Court in Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra 1984 AIR 1622 (Page 152). However, none of the parameters laid down by the Supreme Court in above noted judgment are satisfied against the applicant up to this stage. He, therefore, contends that applicants are liable to be enlarged on bail. In case, the applicants are enlarged on bail, they shall not misuse the liberty of bail and shall co-operate with the trial.
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 3286 - Full Document
1