Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.40 seconds)
Shri G R Gupta vs Lok Sabha Secretariat on 29 November, 2013 cites

New Delhi Municipal Committee vs Kalu Ram & Anr on 20 April, 1976

25. In view of the aforesaid authoritative pronouncement by the Supreme Court, this Court is of the opinion that the distinction sought to be drawn by the respondent between proceedings under Sections 7(1) and 7(2) of the PP Act, 1971, is untenable in law. The reliance of the respondent on the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in L.S. Nair vs. Hindustan Steel Ltd., Bhilai and Ors. (supra) is also misplaced as the same did not deal with or refer to the aforesaid Supreme Court's judgment in New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. Kalu Ram and Another (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 97 - A C Gupta - Full Document

Mani Sanyal, Lakhanlal And Ors., Kuldip ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. And Bihar ... on 4 January, 1969

In support of his submission, Mr. Mittal relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. Kalu Ram and Another, (1976) 3 SCC 407 as well as judgment of High Courts in Lakhanlal Rawat Vs. Union of India, 2010 (2) M.P.H.T. 14 and M/s. Automobile Association of Eastern India and Ors. Vs. The Board of Trustees of the Port of Kolkata and Ors., (2010) 4 CALLT 591 (HC).
Patna High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

M/S. Automobile Association Of Eastern ... vs The Board Of Trustees Of The Port Of ... on 11 June, 2008

In support of his submission, Mr. Mittal relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. Kalu Ram and Another, (1976) 3 SCC 407 as well as judgment of High Courts in Lakhanlal Rawat Vs. Union of India, 2010 (2) M.P.H.T. 14 and M/s. Automobile Association of Eastern India and Ors. Vs. The Board of Trustees of the Port of Kolkata and Ors., (2010) 4 CALLT 591 (HC).
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 26 - Cited by 5 - I Banerjee - Full Document
1   2 Next