Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.40 seconds)

Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors on 12 November, 2013

The counsel for the revisionist argues that in the application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. a clear cognizable case was made out and it was incumbent upon the Magistrate to either have directed for lodging the FIR or to have taken recourse under section 190 Cr.P.C. He has placed reliance on the judgement of the Supreme Court in the case of Lalita Kumari vs. Government of U.P. and others, 2014 (2) SCC 1 as well as the judgement of this Court dated 26.11.2019 passed in Criminal Revision No. 4424 of 2019 (Babooram vs. State of U.P. and 2 others.).
Supreme Court of India Cites 71 - Cited by 18813 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1