Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.22 seconds)Article 67 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Limitation Act, 1963
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani & Anr vs Indusind Bank Ltd. & Ors on 6 December, 2004
16 With a view to counter the aforementioned objection of the
Defendants, Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff has relied upon a Judgment of the
Supreme Court of India titled "Man Kaur (Dead) by Legal
Representatives Vs Hartar Singh Sangha"; VII (2010) SLT 144 in which
Hon'ble Justice R. V. Ravindaran and Hon'ble Justice Aftab Alam have
dealt with a number of case laws including the case of "Janki Vashdeo
Bhojwani and Anr. Vs Indusind Bank Ltd. & Ors.", which was relied
Premjit Singh & Ors. Vs S. Naib Singh & Ors. Page No.9 of 26
Suit No.533/10
upon by the Defendant. The Hon'ble bench had summarized the nature
and extent of the authority of a Power of Attorney Holder in paragraph 12
of its Judgment. The sub-paragraph No. (g) of paragraph no.12 has been
emphasized by the Plaintiff in order to assail upon the objections of the
Defendant. The sub- paragraph (g) of paragraph 12 is as follows:
Section 116 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Man Kaur(Dead)By Lrs vs Hartar Singh Sangha on 5 October, 2010
16 With a view to counter the aforementioned objection of the
Defendants, Ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff has relied upon a Judgment of the
Supreme Court of India titled "Man Kaur (Dead) by Legal
Representatives Vs Hartar Singh Sangha"; VII (2010) SLT 144 in which
Hon'ble Justice R. V. Ravindaran and Hon'ble Justice Aftab Alam have
dealt with a number of case laws including the case of "Janki Vashdeo
Bhojwani and Anr. Vs Indusind Bank Ltd. & Ors.", which was relied
Premjit Singh & Ors. Vs S. Naib Singh & Ors. Page No.9 of 26
Suit No.533/10
upon by the Defendant. The Hon'ble bench had summarized the nature
and extent of the authority of a Power of Attorney Holder in paragraph 12
of its Judgment. The sub-paragraph No. (g) of paragraph no.12 has been
emphasized by the Plaintiff in order to assail upon the objections of the
Defendant. The sub- paragraph (g) of paragraph 12 is as follows:
Bhawanji Lakhamhi & Ors vs Himatlal Jamnadas Dani & Ors on 14 December, 1971
This view has been propounded in the Judgment reported as "Bhawanji
Lakhamashi Vs Himatlal Jamnadas Dani"; AIR 1972 SC 819 .