Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.24 seconds)The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section 51 in The Factories Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
The Lord Krishna Textile Mills vs Its Workmen on 12 December, 1960
The Supreme Court had considered the
extent of jurisdiction of Tribunal under section 33 (2) (b) and had held
in AIR 1961 SC 860, The Lord Krishna Textile Mills v. Its Workmen, in
para 10 as under:
The Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954
The Factories Act, 1948
Strawboard Manufacturing Co vs Gobind on 6 March, 1962
In Strawboard Mfg. Co. v. Gobind it was held that "....sub-
section 2(a), on the other hand, gives power to the employer to alter any
W.P.(C.) Nos. 10744/06, 10765/06, 10740/06, 10760/06, 11684-85/06,
10759/06, 11272/06, 10743/06, 9832/06, 10758/06 Page 21 of 26
conditions of service not connected with the dispute and this the
employer can do without approaching at all the tribunal where the
disputes may be pending."
Air India Corporation, Bombay vs V. A. Rebellow & Anr on 24 February, 1972
15. A division Bench of Orissa High Court in 1990 Lab. I.C 1146
relying on Air India Corporation, Bombay v. V.A.Rebellow, 1972 Lab.I.C
668 and Bhavnagar Municipality v. Alibhai Karmbhai, (1977) I Lab.I.C
834 had held that in order to entitle a workman to the provision of
clause (a) of the sub section (1) of section 33, the following conditions
must cumulatively exist:
Bhavnagar Municipality vs Alibhai Karimbhai & Others on 8 February, 1977
15. A division Bench of Orissa High Court in 1990 Lab. I.C 1146
relying on Air India Corporation, Bombay v. V.A.Rebellow, 1972 Lab.I.C
668 and Bhavnagar Municipality v. Alibhai Karmbhai, (1977) I Lab.I.C
834 had held that in order to entitle a workman to the provision of
clause (a) of the sub section (1) of section 33, the following conditions
must cumulatively exist:
Akhtar Hussain And Naresh Prasad Thakur vs State Of Bihar on 9 July, 1997
In Md Akhtar Hussain v. State of Bihar, (1988) 1 LLJ
325(SC) the Apex Court has observed that " in a complaint to the
W.P.(C.) Nos. 10744/06, 10765/06, 10740/06, 10760/06, 11684-85/06,
10759/06, 11272/06, 10743/06, 9832/06, 10758/06 Page 15 of 26
tribunal under section 33A, the basic question that is to be considered
by the concerned authority is, whether there has been a contravention
by the employer of the provisions of section 33, and it is only in case it
is found that there has, in fact, been such contravention, that the
occasion arises for the authority to embark upon an adjudication to the
dispute contained in the complaint, on its merits." Section 33 has been
enacted for the protection of the workman concerned in the dispute
against victimization by an employer on account of his having raised an
industrial dispute or his being a party to a pending industrial
proceeding and to ensure that pending industrial disputes are brought
to an expeditious determination in a peaceful atmosphere.