Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)Usha Bharti vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 28 March, 2014
So far as the second question is concerned, in Usha Bharti's case
(supra), the Supreme Court was considering, inter alia, calling of a
meeting envisaged under section 28 of the Uttar Pradesh Kshettra
Panchayat and Zila Panchayat Act, 1961. In paragraph 20 of the said
judgment itself, the Supreme Court has made the following observation,
which is quite pertinent and required to be noticed carefully: -
The West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973
Krishna Dhar & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 2 December, 2011
It would be evident from the observations made in the judgment
rendered in Krishna Dhar's case, as quoted above, that the sole object of
introducing sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) under section 12 in the statute-
book by the legislature was only to ensure that a motion of no confidence
for removal of a Pradhan or an Upa-Pradhan was brought about and
6
executed through a transparent democratic process which ensures
elimination of any clandestine design being evolved to oust either of them.
1