Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.24 seconds)

M/S N.N. Global Mercantile Private ... vs M/S Indo Unique Flame Ltd. on 11 January, 2021

82. In the facts of the present case, there is no dispute that the respondent had entered into the agreement that includes the arbitration clause. The dispute, essentially, is Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:GARIMA MADAN ARB.P. 800.2022 Page 8 of 11 Signing Date:12.09.2023 18:09:44 whether the said agreement is invalid as being part of the fraudulent exercise by the promoters of the respondent to siphon funds from the respondent Company. The dispute whether the consent is vitiated on account of fraud, as defined under Section 17 of the Contract Act, 1872, and the agreement is voidable under Section 19 of the said Act, is clearly a matter that can be referred to arbitration. The said issue is no longer res integra in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in N.N. Global Mercantile (P) Ltd. case [N.N. Global Mercantile (P) Ltd. v. Indo Unique Flame Ltd., (2021) 4 SCC 379 : (2021) 2 SCC (Civ) 555] .
Supreme Court of India Cites 110 - Cited by 136 - I Malhotra - Full Document

Zostel Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. vs Oravel Stays Private Limited & Anr. on 14 February, 2022

84. It is well settled that an Arbitral Tribunal is also competent to decide the question regarding arbitrability of disputes. See : Zostel Hospitality (P) Ltd. v. Oravel Stays (P) Ltd. [Zostel Hospitality (P) Ltd. v. Oravel Stays (P) Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:GARIMA MADAN ARB.P. 800.2022 Page 9 of 11 Signing Date:12.09.2023 18:09:44 Ltd., (2021) 9 SCC 765 : (2021) 4 SCC (Civ) 625] and Arasmeta Captive Power Co. (P) Ltd. v. Lafarge India (P) Ltd. [Arasmeta Captive Power Co. (P) Ltd. v. Lafarge India (P) Ltd., (2013) 15 SCC 414 : (2014) 5 SCC (Civ) 302] ." (emphasis supplied)
Delhi High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 2 - C H Shankar - Full Document
1   2 Next