Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (1.98 seconds)
Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution ... vs Central Electricity Regulatory ... on 22 February, 2024 cites

Dalpat Kumar And Anr. vs Prahlad Singh And Ors. on 16 December, 1991

Irreparable injury, however, does not mean that there must be no physical possibility of repairing the injury, but means only that the injury must be a material one, namely one that cannot be adequately compensated by way of damages (Dalpat Kumar v. Prahlad Singh, (1992) 1 SCC 719 : AIR 1993 SC 276; Mahadeo Savlaram Shelke v. Puna Municipal Corporation, (1995) 3 SCC 33).
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 516 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Parampujya Solar Energy Pvt. Ltd & Anr vs Central Electricity Regulatory ... on 15 September, 2022

PER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN, CHAIRPERSON We had, in our earlier order dated 30.11.2023, noted the submission of Mr. Basava Prabhu S. Patil, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the 2nd Respondent, that, in the light of the order of the Supreme Court in the appeal preferred against the judgement of this Tribunal in "Parampujya Solar Energy Private Limited and Another vs. Central Electricity Regulatory and Others (Order in Appeal No. 256 of 2019 dated 15.09.2022)", they would, for the time being, not insist on payment of carrying cost; and, in case the Appellant pays the principal amount along with the discounted factor as determined by the Commission, they would not take any coercive action during the pendency of the appeal. In the light of this submission of the learned Senior Counsel, we had observed that there was no reason to grant an ex parte ad interim stay. Time was granted to the respondents to file reply, and thereafter for the appellant to file rejoinder. After completion of pleadings, the IA for interim relief has been listed before us.
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity Cites 53 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next