Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.19 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 21 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Union Of India & Anr vs M.M. Sarkar on 8 December, 2009
In Union of India v. M.K.
Sarkar, (2010) 2 SCC 59, this Court held that even
where a belated representation is considered and
rejected pursuant to a court's direction, the
rejection does not furnish a fresh cause of action.
The question of limitation, delay and laches has to
be examined with reference to the original cause of
action and not with reference to the date on which
-6-
NC: 2026:KHC:5936-DB
WP No. 24986 of 2023
HC-KAR
an order is passed on a representation in
compliance with such a direction. We believe that a
court or tribunal, before issuing a direction for
"consideration" without examining the merits, must
first satisfy itself that the claim relates to a live
issue. If the claim pertains to a stale or dead issue,
the court must put an end to the matter rather than
enable avoidable, successive rounds of litigation.
State Of U.P.& Ors vs Arvind Kumar Srivastava & Ors on 17 October, 2014
In State of Uttar
Pradesh v. Arvind Kumar Srivastava, (2015) 1 SCC
347, this Court has explained these principles
succinctly in the following portion:
1