Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.22 seconds)Section 16 in The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 [Entire Act]
Bihar State Council Of Ayurvedic And ... vs State Of Bihar And Ors. [Alongwith Civil ... on 1 November, 2007
20. In the counter affidavit filed by the
respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 7, it has been stated that though it has
been admitted by them that they have given temporary lease to
some private persons for carrying out mining into the said area
for which the tender notice was published but the said
temporary lease were granted in terms of the orders passed by
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pawan Kumar
(supra). It has also been stated that after conducing the fresh
DSRs in terms of the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court,
fresh e-auction was conducted for the sand ghat, in which the
petitioner participated in the tender and became the highest
bidder for Aurangabad Sone Sand Block No.8. The respondents
have emphasized Clause-42(xix) of the Tender Document,
wherein it it has been provided that before participating in the
tender, the bidders should, at their own level, consider among
other things, the availability of sand in the Balughat area but, no
Patna High Court CWJC No.5097 of 2024 dt.19-03-2026
14/27
objection or claim of any kind shall be entertained after the
auction process. In view of the aforesaid clause of the Tender
Document, the petitioner being fully satisfied about the
availability of sand and other factors made the bid in the e-
auction to the tune of Rs. 61,43,55,300/- against the minimum
reserve amount of Rs. 26,71,11,000/- and now the claim of the
petitioner cannot be entertained.
State Of Bihar And Others vs Jain Plastics And Chemicals Limited on 21 November, 2001
In support of this submission, he has relied
upon a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
State of Bihar vs. Jain Plastics reported as AIR 2002 SC 206.
Rajasthan State I.D.I.Corpn. Ltd. & Anr vs Diamond & Gem Dev. Corpn. Ltd. & Anr on 12 February, 2013
In support of this submission, he has relied
upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Rajasthan SIDS vs. Diamond &Gem reported as (2013) 5 SCC
470, wherein it has been held that a party who has voluntarily
accepted the contractual terms cannot approbate and reprobate.
Manjeet Chawla vs State & Ors on 9 May, 2018
37. Recently, this Court in the case of Manjeet
Chawla vs. State of Bihar & Ors. reported as 2026 SCC
OnLine Pat 535 has already held that replenishment study is
sine qua non for sand mining projects.
Ut Of J&K And Ors vs Muzaffar Ahmad Bhat And Ors on 22 May, 2023
12. It has been submitted by learned counsel for
the petitioner that the Hon'ble Supreme Court recently in the
case of Union Territory of J&K & Anr. vs. Raja Muzzaffar
Bhat & Ors. reported as 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1789, has held
that replenishment report is mandatory and even DSR without
such report is void.
1