Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (1.22 seconds)
Iqbal Khan vs Banshi And Ors on 22 February, 2024 cites

Raj Kumar vs Ajay Kumar & Anr on 18 October, 2010

4. Evidently, the present case is a case of serious injury and not of permanent disablement incapacitating the appellant to follow the same vocation or other vocations, however, considering the settled criteria and heads under which claim in case of serious injury would be allowed, the law has been clearly stated in Raj Kumar (supra) as well as in Jagdish vs. Mohan and ors. reported in (2018) 4 SCC 571.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 3811 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Jagdish vs Mohan on 6 March, 2018

4. Evidently, the present case is a case of serious injury and not of permanent disablement incapacitating the appellant to follow the same vocation or other vocations, however, considering the settled criteria and heads under which claim in case of serious injury would be allowed, the law has been clearly stated in Raj Kumar (supra) as well as in Jagdish vs. Mohan and ors. reported in (2018) 4 SCC 571.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 229 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document
1