cites: 1355127

20. Fourteen decisions are considered, six of which are of the Supreme Court, one of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, two of this Court, four of the Madras High Court and one of the Orissa High Court They are : State of Punjab v. Nathu Ram, ; Ram Sarup v. Munshi, ; Daya Ram v. Shyam Sundari, ; Mohd Sulaiman v. Md. Ismail, ; Dolai Maliko v. Krushna Chandra, ; Ram Das v. Dy. Director of Consolidation.

Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 77 - J C Shah - Full Document

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 1485

20. Fourteen decisions are considered, six of which are of the Supreme Court, one of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, two of this Court, four of the Madras High Court and one of the Orissa High Court They are : State of Punjab v. Nathu Ram, ; Ram Sarup v. Munshi, ; Daya Ram v. Shyam Sundari, ; Mohd Sulaiman v. Md. Ismail, ; Dolai Maliko v. Krushna Chandra, ; Ram Das v. Dy. Director of Consolidation.

Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 175 - N R Ayyangar - Full Document

20. Fourteen decisions are considered, six of which are of the Supreme Court, one of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, two of this Court, four of the Madras High Court and one of the Orissa High Court They are : State of Punjab v. Nathu Ram, ; Ram Sarup v. Munshi, ; Daya Ram v. Shyam Sundari, ; Mohd Sulaiman v. Md. Ismail, ; Dolai Maliko v. Krushna Chandra, ; Ram Das v. Dy. Director of Consolidation.

Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 86 - N R Ayyangar - Full Document

20. Fourteen decisions are considered, six of which are of the Supreme Court, one of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, two of this Court, four of the Madras High Court and one of the Orissa High Court They are : State of Punjab v. Nathu Ram, ; Ram Sarup v. Munshi, ; Daya Ram v. Shyam Sundari, ; Mohd Sulaiman v. Md. Ismail, ; Dolai Maliko v. Krushna Chandra, ; Ram Das v. Dy. Director of Consolidation.

Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 41 - K N Wanchoo - Full Document

20. Fourteen decisions are considered, six of which are of the Supreme Court, one of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, two of this Court, four of the Madras High Court and one of the Orissa High Court They are : State of Punjab v. Nathu Ram, ; Ram Sarup v. Munshi, ; Daya Ram v. Shyam Sundari, ; Mohd Sulaiman v. Md. Ismail, ; Dolai Maliko v. Krushna Chandra, ; Ram Das v. Dy. Director of Consolidation.

Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 15 - A N Grover - Full Document

; Khiarajmal v. Diam, (1905) 32 Ind App 23 = ILR 32 Cal 296 (PC); Bibhuti v. Narendra, ; Prabhat v. Birendra, (1969) 73 Cal WN 932; K. M. Marakkayar v. M. K. Ayyar, (1903) ILR 26 Mad 230; K. K. Behari v. Kunhipakki, AIR 1930 Mad 69; Chaturbhujadoss Kushaldoss v. Rajamanicka Mudali, AIR 1930 Mad 930 = ILR 54 Mad 212; Shanmugham v. Govindasami, ; Sarat Chandra v. Bichitranada Sahu, AIR 1951 Orissa 212 (229).

Madras High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

; Khiarajmal v. Diam, (1905) 32 Ind App 23 = ILR 32 Cal 296 (PC); Bibhuti v. Narendra, ; Prabhat v. Birendra, (1969) 73 Cal WN 932; K. M. Marakkayar v. M. K. Ayyar, (1903) ILR 26 Mad 230; K. K. Behari v. Kunhipakki, AIR 1930 Mad 69; Chaturbhujadoss Kushaldoss v. Rajamanicka Mudali, AIR 1930 Mad 930 = ILR 54 Mad 212; Shanmugham v. Govindasami, ; Sarat Chandra v. Bichitranada Sahu, AIR 1951 Orissa 212 (229).

Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

; Khiarajmal v. Diam, (1905) 32 Ind App 23 = ILR 32 Cal 296 (PC); Bibhuti v. Narendra, ; Prabhat v. Birendra, (1969) 73 Cal WN 932; K. M. Marakkayar v. M. K. Ayyar, (1903) ILR 26 Mad 230; K. K. Behari v. Kunhipakki, AIR 1930 Mad 69; Chaturbhujadoss Kushaldoss v. Rajamanicka Mudali, AIR 1930 Mad 930 = ILR 54 Mad 212; Shanmugham v. Govindasami, ; Sarat Chandra v. Bichitranada Sahu, AIR 1951 Orissa 212 (229).

Orissa High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

21. Six other decisions of the Supreme Court and a Full Bench decision of this Court touching the point of abatement are also considered but they do not relate to the point at issue. They are: Union of India v. Ramcharan, ; Rameshwar Prasad v. Shyam Beharilal Jagannath, ; Union of India v. Sree Ram Bohra, ; Sri Chand v. Jagdish Pershad, ; Rani v. Santa Bala, ; Mahabir Prasad v. Jaga Ram, ; Santosh Kumar v. Nanda Lal, .

Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 22 - R Dayal - Full Document

Search Results Page