Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.28 seconds)
Piyush Sharma vs Central Reserve Police Force on 2 November, 2018 cites

State Of Haryana vs Satish Kumar Mittal & Anr on 7 September, 2010

He submits that the appellant was married to her deceased sister in year 2004. He relies on copy of ration card issued in favour of Satish Kumar on 21.08.2008. The card shows age of Satish as 27 years in year 2008. Also the appellant produced copy of judgment dated 19.05.2014 pronounced by Sessions Judge Rewari in SC No. 39/2013 titled as State versus Satish Kumar S/o Ram Niwas in support of his contention. He submits that all the documents relied upon by him are part of judicial file of Sessions Judge Rewari which were produced by said Satish Kumar in course of latter's trial. An appeal is now stated to be pending before Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court. The Ld. Counsel submits that in order to hide his actual age and fabricate a proof of fake date of birth, the said Satish Kumar again appeared in secondary examination of National Open School in year April 2008 under roll no. 05013662428 and malafidely mentioned his date of birth as 06.10.1988 - thereby reducing it by 08 years.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 104 - Full Document

S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) By ... vs Jagannath (Dead) By L.Rs. And Others on 27 October, 1993

11. It is a settled proposition of law that where an applicant gets an office by misrepresenting the facts or by playing fraud upon the competent authority, such an order cannot be sustained in the eyes of law. "Fraud avoids all judicial acts, ecclesiastical or temporal." (Vide: S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs. v. Jagannath (Dead) by L.Rs. and Ors. MANU/SC/0192/1994 : AIR 1994 SC 853.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 1512 - K Singh - Full Document
1