Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.28 seconds)The Karnataka Small Cause Courts Act, 1964
Section 13 in The Karnataka Small Cause Courts Act, 1964 [Entire Act]
Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001
Uttam Veranekar vs Shattu Laxman Donkari on 23 January, 1986
In yet another Decision of this Court UTTAM VERANEKAR v. SHATTU LAXMAN DONAKARI, practically relating to the very same Amending Act 17 of 83, the suit which had been earlier instituted and had been even decreed by the Court of Small Causes on 18-6-1982 it was contended that undisputedly the Court had jurisdiction to entertain the suit at the time of its institution and it had also jurisdiction to decree the suit when it was decreed and therefore, there was no scope to interfere with the said Judgment and Decree in revision. The said contention was repelled by this Court by placing reliance upon the Decision of the Supreme Court adverted to already.
Smt. Dayawati And Another vs Inderjit And Others on 14 January, 1966
8. The learned Advocate for the plaintiff contended that in the Decision of the Supreme Court reported in A.I.R. 1985 S.C. 1111 the observations made in the earlier Decision in DAYAWATI AND ANR. v. INDERJIT AND ORS., AIR 1966 SC 1422 @ 1426 have been followed. They are as under: