Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.20 seconds)Section 9 in Children Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 17 in Children Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Ram Chandra Kailash Kumar And Company ... vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 25 March, 1980
15. This case stands squarely covered by the judgment of
Constitution Bench of this Court in Ram Chandra Kailash Kumar &
13
Co. & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr., AIR 1980 SC 1124, wherein the
provision of the Act 1964, which is involved in the instant case was
considered and the Court held as under:
M/S. Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 14 May, 2008
18. Shri Subramonium Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the
respondents, has placed very heavy reliance upon the judgment of this
Court in M/s. Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar v. State of Uttar Pradesh &
Ors., AIR 2008 SC 2733, wherein it has been held that market fee is
leviable on specified agricultural produce and not on agricultural
produce simplicitor. Zarda, the end product of the manufacturing
process is not a specified agricultural produce and it can be subjected to
payment of market fee provided it is held to be "Tobacco". Zafrani
Zarda, does not answer the description of specified agricultural
produce as defined under Section 2(a) of the Act. If it is held that
Zafrani Zarda is merely a processed form of "Tobacco", it could be
subjected to levy of market fee, but if it is manufactured it would not.