B.Jayaraj vs State Of A.P on 28 March, 2014
6. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant would
submit that both the complainant and P.W.2/accompanying
witness turned hostile to the prosecution case and also stated
that the amount was thrust into the pocket of the appellant.
Further, the prosecution failed to prove the aspect of demand
since P.W.1 has disowned the complaint and the contents of
complaint Ex.P9 were not proved. Both P.Ws.1 and 2 denied
any kind of demand by the appellant, as such, the appellant is
entitled to be acquitted of the charge. He relied on the
judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of; i)
B.Jayaraj v. State of A.P in Criminal Appeal No.696 of 2014;