Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.15 seconds)
Pramod Kumar Vaishnav And Another vs State Of Chhattisgarh 13 Cra/97/2013 ... on 20 November, 2019
cites
Kalyan Kumar Gogoi vs Ashutosh Agnihotri & Anr on 18 January, 2011
9. As per law laid down by Hon'ble the Apex Court, hearsay
evidence is inadmissible in evidence and same cannot be acted upon
regarding any finding. In the present case, there is no direct evidence
of assaulting Sheela by any of the appellants. There is no medical
evidence to establish that Sheela really sustained injury on her body.
The evidence which is adduced by the prosecution is totally hearsay in
nature and on the basis of hearsay evidence it cannot be said that the
appellants by any wilful conduct caused grave injury or danger to life to
said Sheela or harassed her to meet any unlawful demand, therefore,
charge under Section 498-A of IPC is not established against the
present appellants. Finding arrived at by the trial court is not
sustainable.
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
1