Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.29 seconds)
M/S. Isha Kitchens, Raipur,Raipur vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... on 20 May, 2025
cites
Section 250 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income Tax on 4 December, 1996
In our view, the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
National Thermal Power Company Ltd. Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) provides that
any legal issue which goes to the root of the matter and is established
through legal principles, the assessee can take up and raise such legal issue
at any appellate forum irrespective of whether the assessee had raised such
legal issue at the sub-ordinate level or not, however, it always depends on
facts and circumstances of each case whether the Tribunal would decide the
legal ground or in a case where the question is of natural justice and ex-
parte order by the Ld. CIT(Appeals) the Tribunal would remand it back to
Ld. CIT(Appeals) providing final opportunity to a bonafide assessee. The
Tribunal as the highest fact finding authority must be certain enough that
the impugned order before it has been passed on merits and is a speaking
order where the assessee has also complied during the process of litigation.
In case, where the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) itself is ex-parte and some
legal ground is raised and if the Tribunal decides such legal ground where
in fact principles of natural justice is left unanswered due to the fact that the
impugned order before the Tribunal is ex-parte and there was no
compliance by the assessee in such scenario the Tribunal would also be
usurping the power of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) which is also a statutory
authority as per the Act. This is due to the reason that as per framework of
the Act, Ld. CIT(Appeals) is the first appellate authority where an appeal by
assessee it would be substantially decided through a speaking order by the
Ld. CIT(Appeals). When this part is over and either party is aggrieved
second appeal lies before the ITAT. Now if for every ex-parte order passed
by the Ld. CIT(Appeals), of course due to non-compliance by the assessee, if
the Tribunal adjudicates a legal ground, for instance validity of assessment
or reassessment order and answers it in favour of the assessee then it would
create an easy route for assessee getting redressal from Tribunal even
without bothering to comply with hearing notices before the Ld.
CIT(Appeals).
Section 133A in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 139 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Income Tax Act, 1961
Section 33 in Income Tax Rules, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 144 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
K.P. Singh Bhadoria Contractor vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ... on 8 April, 2019
In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, respectfully following
the aforesaid decision in the case of Brajesh Singh Bhadoria (supra), as
fairly conceded by both the parties herein, the matter is restored back to
the file of Ld. CIT(A) for denovo adjudication, within a period of 3 months
from the receipt of this order.
1