Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30 (0.38 seconds)All India Film Corporation Ltd. & Ors vs Shri Raja Gyan Nath And Ors on 26 September, 1969
The East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, similarly had Section 13, wherein it is enacted that a tenant cannot be evicted from the tenancy unless the landlord can make out a case for eviction under Section 13 of the Act. The East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 was considered by the Supreme Court in the All India Film Corporation Ltd. v. Raja Gyan Nath, (1969) 3 SCC 79 (supra). In both these cases the Supreme Court held that such tenancy under the Rent Acts of Punjab and M. P. is not protected after the mortgagor has redeemed the property from mortgage and that after such redemption, the relationship of landlord and tenant between the mortgagee and his tenant is extinguished without any new relationship of landlord and tenant coming into existence between the mortgagor and the erstwhile tenant of the mortgagee.
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Ghamandi Ram And Anr. vs Shanker Lal And Anr. on 6 May, 1965
Thus there is no doubt that Ghamandi Ram's case (ibid) stands overruled.
Mahabir Gope And Others vs Harbans Narain Singh And Others on 14 April, 1952
The Supreme Court after referring to the earlier decisions namely, Mahavir Gope v. Harbans Narain Singh AIR 1952 SC 205 (supra) and Asaram v. Mst.