Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.30 seconds)

Hari Ram vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 5 May, 2009

It was at this stage, that an application, Annexure No.2, was filed by the revisionist on 19.1.2002 whereby he prayed that an inquiry be made for determining his age and his trial be separated from rest of the accused and it be transferred to the competent authority under the Act, ie: Juvenile Justice Board, for trial. Pending disposal of Annexure No.2, revisionist filed another application 176-Kha on 18.1.2010, copy of which has not been appended along with this revision, whereby he prayed that in view of decision in Hari Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan: JIC 2009 (3) 509 (SC), his application, Annexure No.2, be considered and decided. Pending consideration his both the aforesaid applications regarding his juvenility, revisionist moved a third application on 24.5.2010, vide paper no.186 Kha, Annexure No.IV, whereby he prayed that his application, Annexure No.2 and subsequent application dated 18.1.2010 be considered and decided simultaneously.
Supreme Court of India Cites 35 - Cited by 282 - A Kabir - Full Document
1   2 Next