Ram Kumar Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 12 January, 2010
3. Against the impugned order of framing of the charge,
revisionists have filed the revision petition assailing the said
order stating that the order is not proper, legal and correct.
The only arguments of the revisionists' is HC Virender was
the beat constable and everybody knew him and the whole
CR No. 87/13 Page No. 3
Rakesh Chhabra & another Vs. State
story of the prosecution as he was sent as decoy customer is
nothing but a concocted story. Trial court had made
observation that this fact can be taken on later stage is a
wrong observation because it is admitted fact that the HC
Virender was sent as decoy customer as well as he used to
sign the register when checked in the hotel.