Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.68 seconds)THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015
The Designs Act, 2000
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Exemption) Yamini Manohar vs T K D Keerthi on 21 April, 2023
2. Considering the averments made in the present application wherein
the plaintiffs seek urgent ad-interim reliefs as also appointment of Local
Commissioner and further in view of Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Krithi
2023 SCC OnLine 1382 and Chandra Kishore Chaurasia vs. R. A.
Perfumery Works Private Limited 2022:DHC: 4454-DB, the plaintiffs are
exempted from instituting pre-litigation mediation.
Chandra Kishore Chaurasia vs R A Perfumery Works Private Limited on 25 August, 2021
2. Considering the averments made in the present application wherein
the plaintiffs seek urgent ad-interim reliefs as also appointment of Local
Commissioner and further in view of Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Krithi
2023 SCC OnLine 1382 and Chandra Kishore Chaurasia vs. R. A.
Perfumery Works Private Limited 2022:DHC: 4454-DB, the plaintiffs are
exempted from instituting pre-litigation mediation.
The Commercial Courts, Commercial Division And Commercial Appellate Division Of High Courts Act, 2015
M/S.Heinz Italia & Anr vs M/S.Dabur India Ltd on 18 May, 2007
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/08/2024 at 21:04:10
what is held in Cadila Health Care v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd AIR
2001 SC 1952, Heinz Italia & Anr. v. Dabur India Ltd. (2007) 6 SCC 1,
Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited vs. Yashwantrao Mohite
Krushna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana (2024) 2 SCC 577 and Brittania
Industries Ltd. v. ITC India Ltd. (2021) SCC OnLine Del 1489, this
Court is to be more cautious and stringent while dealing with matters
relating to such pharmaceutical products since there is a likelihood of
confusion arising in the minds of general public, if the competing mark,
trade dress and design of the defendants are allowed to subsist and /or
continue.
Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private ... vs Yashwantrao Mohite Krushna Sahakari ... on 14 September, 2023
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/08/2024 at 21:04:10
what is held in Cadila Health Care v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd AIR
2001 SC 1952, Heinz Italia & Anr. v. Dabur India Ltd. (2007) 6 SCC 1,
Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited vs. Yashwantrao Mohite
Krushna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana (2024) 2 SCC 577 and Brittania
Industries Ltd. v. ITC India Ltd. (2021) SCC OnLine Del 1489, this
Court is to be more cautious and stringent while dealing with matters
relating to such pharmaceutical products since there is a likelihood of
confusion arising in the minds of general public, if the competing mark,
trade dress and design of the defendants are allowed to subsist and /or
continue.
Britannia Industries Ltd vs Itc Ltd on 25 March, 2021
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/08/2024 at 21:04:10
what is held in Cadila Health Care v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd AIR
2001 SC 1952, Heinz Italia & Anr. v. Dabur India Ltd. (2007) 6 SCC 1,
Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited vs. Yashwantrao Mohite
Krushna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana (2024) 2 SCC 577 and Brittania
Industries Ltd. v. ITC India Ltd. (2021) SCC OnLine Del 1489, this
Court is to be more cautious and stringent while dealing with matters
relating to such pharmaceutical products since there is a likelihood of
confusion arising in the minds of general public, if the competing mark,
trade dress and design of the defendants are allowed to subsist and /or
continue.
1