Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 42 (0.39 seconds)

Bhagwant Singh vs Commissioner Of Police, Delhi on 6 May, 1983

54.The learned Senior Counsel further contended that all the persons involved in the cash-for-job scam are not named, particularly, the FIR named accused persons namely, Mr.Baskar and Mr.Kesavan were dropped Page 66 of 86 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.224 of 2021, Crl.O.P.Nos.13914, 15122 & 6621 of 2021 by the investigating officer without notice to the complainant Mr.Devasagayam, which is in violation of law declared by the Supreme Court in Bhagwant Sing Vs. Commissioner of Police AIR 1985 SC 1285, the Supreme Court decision in Union Public Service Commission Vs. Papaiah AIR 1997 SC 3876 and also against the principle stated by our High Court in C.Ve.Shanmugam S/o.Venugopal Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, 2010 2 MLJ criminal page 833.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 374 - R S Pathak - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next