Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.28 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
State, Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi vs Sunil And Another on 29 November, 2000
".....The witnesses from the department of
police cannot per se be said to be
untruthful or unreliable. It would depend
upon the veracity, credibility and
unimpeachability of their testimony. This
Court, after referring to State of U. P. Vs.
Anil Singh, State, Govt. of NCT of Deli Vs.
Sunil and Another and Ramjee Rai and
Others Vs. State of Bihar, has laid down
recently in Kasmiri Lal Vs. State of
Haryana that there is no absolute
command of law that the police officers
cannot be cited as witnesses and their
testimony should always be treated with
suspicion. Ordinarily, the public at large
show their disinclination to come forward
to become witnesses. If the testimony of
the police officer is found to be reliable and
trustworthy, the Court cannot definitely act
upon the same.
Ramjee Rai & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 24 August, 2006
".....The witnesses from the department of
police cannot per se be said to be
untruthful or unreliable. It would depend
upon the veracity, credibility and
unimpeachability of their testimony. This
Court, after referring to State of U. P. Vs.
Anil Singh, State, Govt. of NCT of Deli Vs.
Sunil and Another and Ramjee Rai and
Others Vs. State of Bihar, has laid down
recently in Kasmiri Lal Vs. State of
Haryana that there is no absolute
command of law that the police officers
cannot be cited as witnesses and their
testimony should always be treated with
suspicion. Ordinarily, the public at large
show their disinclination to come forward
to become witnesses. If the testimony of
the police officer is found to be reliable and
trustworthy, the Court cannot definitely act
upon the same.
Dr. Parmod Kumar Dhailwal vs Gnct Of Delhi & Ors on 26 May, 2015
7. It is limpid that the prosecution has examined one police witness
only. Thus, it is to be seen whether reliance can be placed upon
their testimonies. The law in this regard is settled by Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Parmod Kumar Vs. State (NCT) of Delhi, AIR
2013 SC344 as under:-
Section 6 in The Delhi Prevention of Touting and Malpractices Against Tourists Act, 2010 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Delhi Prevention of Touting and Malpractices Against Tourists Act, 2010 [Entire Act]
Kashmiri Lal vs State Of Haryana on 15 May, 2013
".....The witnesses from the department of
police cannot per se be said to be
untruthful or unreliable. It would depend
upon the veracity, credibility and
unimpeachability of their testimony. This
Court, after referring to State of U. P. Vs.
Anil Singh, State, Govt. of NCT of Deli Vs.
Sunil and Another and Ramjee Rai and
Others Vs. State of Bihar, has laid down
recently in Kasmiri Lal Vs. State of
Haryana that there is no absolute
command of law that the police officers
cannot be cited as witnesses and their
testimony should always be treated with
suspicion. Ordinarily, the public at large
show their disinclination to come forward
to become witnesses. If the testimony of
the police officer is found to be reliable and
trustworthy, the Court cannot definitely act
upon the same.
State Of U.P vs Anil Singh on 26 August, 1988
".....The witnesses from the department of
police cannot per se be said to be
untruthful or unreliable. It would depend
upon the veracity, credibility and
unimpeachability of their testimony. This
Court, after referring to State of U. P. Vs.
Anil Singh, State, Govt. of NCT of Deli Vs.
Sunil and Another and Ramjee Rai and
Others Vs. State of Bihar, has laid down
recently in Kasmiri Lal Vs. State of
Haryana that there is no absolute
command of law that the police officers
cannot be cited as witnesses and their
testimony should always be treated with
suspicion. Ordinarily, the public at large
show their disinclination to come forward
to become witnesses. If the testimony of
the police officer is found to be reliable and
trustworthy, the Court cannot definitely act
upon the same.
1