Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.31 seconds)
N J Singh vs National Technical Research ... on 15 March, 2016 cites

Uoi & Ors. vs Vijender Singh & Ors. on 29 November, 2010

In regard to Para-8 (ii) of the prayer of the O.A., reproduced above, it is clear that there is no concept of ante-dated seniority, and in that we agree and concur with the observations of the Bangalore Bench of this Tribunal in OA No.190/2013 Shri Govardhana vs. Chairman and Managing Director of BSNL and Others (supra), as cited by the respondents in reply to Para 4.21 of the OA, and also the order of another Coordinate Bench dated 16.01.2015 in N.C. Bhuyan vs. Union of India & Others (supra), and we are also bound to follow the law, as laid down by the Hon'ble High Court through its judgment dated 29.11.2010 in Union of India vs. 14 OA No-345/2015 Vijender Singh and Others (supra), and related Writ Petitions, Paragraphs 42 & 43 of which have been relied upon by the respondents in the counter reply.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 27 - P Nandrajog - Full Document

Nirmal Chandra Sinha vs Union Of India & Ors on 31 March, 2008

The respondents had thereafter relied upon Paragraph- 42 of the Delhi High Court judgment in Union of India vs. Vijender Singh and Others, WP (C) No.1188-90/2005 dated 29.11.2010, in which the aspect that promotion can only be prospective was reiterated, citing the Apex Court judgment in the case of Nirmal Chandra Sinha vs. Union of India & Ors. 2008 (14) SCC 29. It was, therefore, submitted that the OA is devoid of any merit, and is liable to be dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 85 - M Katju - Full Document
1