Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.24 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Patel Field Marshal Agencies And Anr. vs P.M Diesels Ltd. And Ors. on 29 November, 2017
2. The counsel for the plaintiffs has contended that (i) the application of
the plaintiff, in this suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of
trade mark, under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 is pending
consideration; (ii) in view of Patel Field Marshal Agencies Vs. P.M.
Diesels Ltd. (2018) 2 SCC 112, the amendment of the plaint was allowed to
take the pleas of invalidity of the registration in favour of defendant; (iii)
CS(COMM) 51/2016 Page 1 of 4
that the defendant, in the written statement to the amended plaint has
pleaded a large number of other registrations obtained by the defendant, of
marks similar/deceptively similar to the mark subject matter of the present
suit; (iv) that the pleadings of the plaintiffs in the amended plaint are wide
enough to cover besides the registrations pleaded in favour of defendant,
also any other registration in favour of the defendant besides the
registrations expressly pleaded in the plaint; and, (v) that the plaintiffs will
withdraw IA No.1814/2020 on clarification being rendered by this Court
that the plaintiffs, while urging the application under Section 124 of the
Trade Marks Act, shall also be entitled to argue with respect to the new
registrations disclosed by the defendant in the written statement to the
amended plaint.
Micolube India Ltd. vs Maggon Auto Centre And Anr. on 7 February, 2008
5. The counsel for the defendant has referred to Micolube India Ltd. Vs.
Maggon Auto Centre & Anr. 150 (2008) DLT 458, particularly to
paragraph 24 thereof holding as under:-
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
1